Slovenski evroposlanci (ki naj bi bili izvoljeni s strani ljudstva Slovenije in naj bi delali v najbolj\u0161em interesu le-teh), NE \u017dELIJO, da se objavijo neredigirane pogodbe za nakup “cepiv” proti COVID 19, torej, NE \u017dELIJO, da ima ljudstvo Slovenije vpogled za kaj in koliko njihovega davkopla\u010devalskega denarja je nekdo porabil, ne da bi bil kdorkoli od prebivalcev Slovenije (pla\u010dnikov) o tem karkoli vpra\u0161an.<\/p>\n
Namre\u010d, 17. januarja 2024 se je na plenarni seji EU Parlamenta, med ostalim, glasovalo o amandmajih na poro\u010dilo Petra Jahra o delu evropskega ombudsmana. Evroposlanec Cristian Terhe\u015f je v imenu skupine ECR podal 6 amandmajev na tekst poro\u010dila. Vseh 6 amandmajev je bilo zavrnjenih in potem je bil tekst v celoti sprejet. Posebej je zanimiv amandma \u0161t. 6, v katerem se predlaga dodatni \u010dlen poro\u010dila in sicer: “14a. Pozivi varuhU \u010dlovekovih pravic, naj Komisijo \u0161e naprej poziva, naj nemudoma objavi neredigirane pogodbe v zvezi z javnim naro\u010dilom cepiv COVID-19”.<\/p>\n
Sicer, za amandmaja 1 in 6 sta Brglez in Nemec glasovala “ZA”, za amandma 4 je Brglez glasoval “ZA”.<\/p>\n
Vsi ostali so glasovali “PROTI” vsem \u0161estim amandmajem.<\/p>\n
Potem so VSI SLOVENSKI EU POSLANCI GLASOVALI, DA SE BESEDILO PORO\u010cILA SPREJME V CELOTI BREZ SPREMEMB.<\/strong><\/p>\n ALI TO POMENI, DA SO GLASOVALI V SKLADU IN V DOGOVORU Z VLADO SLOVENIJE?<\/strong><\/p>\n Originalni dokument s predlo\u017eenimi amandmaji:<\/p>\n Rezltati glasovanja (poimensko) – strani 103-116<\/p>\n Predlo\u017eeni amandmaji: *** prevod ***<\/em> Cristian Terhe\u015f Predlog resolucije Predlog resolucije Sprememba Sprememba za \/ proti \/ vzdr\u017eani – 185, 423, 9 Cristian Terhe\u015f Predlog resolucije Sprememba za \/ proti \/ vzdr\u017eani – 194, 373, 39 Cristian Terhe\u015f Predlog resolucije Sprememba za \/ proti \/ vzdr\u017eani – 220, 365, 32 Cristian Terhe\u015f Predlog resolucije Sprememba za \/ proti \/ vzdr\u017eani – 159, 358, 99 Cristian Terhe\u015f Predlog resolucije Sprememba za \/ proti \/ vzdr\u017eani – 265, 348, 11 Cristian Terhe\u015f Predlog resolucije Sprememba za \/ proti \/ vzdr\u017eani – 254, 349, 17<\/p>\n Za sprejem poro\u010dila v celoti:<\/strong> Potek glasovanja
\n
\nAmendment 1<\/strong>
\n
\nCristian Terhe\u015f<\/strong>
\non behalf of the ECR Group<\/strong>
\n
\nMotion for a resolution<\/strong>
\nRecital O<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n
\nMotion for a resolution Amendment
\nO. whereas the Ombudsman opened a strategic inquiry into the systemic and significant delays in how the Commission handles requests for public access to documents;
\nwhereas the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission\u2019s way of handling such requests, notably in dealing with requests to review initial decisions (\u2018confirmatory applications\u2019)6<\/sup>;
\n
\nAmendment
\nO. whereas the Ombudsman opened a strategic inquiry into the systemic and significant delays in how the Commission handles requests for public access to documents, including documents concerning the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines;
\nwhereas the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission\u2019s way of handling such requests, notably in dealing with requests to review initial decisions (\u2018confirmatory applications\u2019)6<\/sup>;
\n__________
\n<\/span><\/em>6<\/sup> European Ombudsman, \u2018Decision on the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (strategic inquiry OI\/2\/2022\/OAM)\u2019, 18 September 2023.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\nSprememba 1<\/p>\n
\nv imenu skupine ECR<\/p>\n
\nUvodna izjava O<\/p>\n
\nO. ker je varuh \u010dlovekovih pravic za\u010del strate\u0161ko preiskavo o sistemskih in znatnih zamudah pri obravnavi zahtevkov za dostop javnosti do dokumentov s strani Komisije;
\nker je varuh \u010dlovekovih pravic ugotovil nepravilnosti pri na\u010dinu obravnavanja takih zahtevkov s strani Komisije, zlasti pri obravnavanju zahtevkov za pregled prvotnih odlo\u010ditev (“potrditvenih zahtevkov”)6<\/sup>;<\/p>\n
\nO. ker je varuh \u010dlovekovih pravic za\u010del strate\u0161ko preiskavo o sistemskih in znatnih zamudah pri tem, kako Komisija obravnava zahteve za dostop javnosti do dokumentov, vklju\u010dno z dokumenti v zvezi z nakupom cepiv COVID-19;
\nker je varuh \u010dlovekovih pravic ugotovil nepravilnosti pri na\u010dinu obravnavanja takih zahtevkov s strani Komisije, zlasti pri obravnavanju zahtevkov za revizijo prvotnih odlo\u010ditev (“potrditvenih zahtevkov”)<\/p>\n
\n
\nAmendment 2<\/strong>
\n
\nCristian Terhe\u015f<\/strong>
\non behalf of the ECR Group<\/strong>
\n
\nMotion for a resolution<\/strong>
\nRecital P a (new)<\/strong>
\n
\nAmendment
\nPa. whereas in 2022 the Ombudsman continued to receive a large number of complaints related to the COVID-19 pandemic, predominantly concerning measures national authorities had put in place in response to the pandemic and the right to move freely within the EU;
\nwhereas the Ombudsman replied even to the complaints that were out of mandate and to all those seeking help in the language of their complaint or in the language of their preference by clarifying the Ombudsman\u2019s mandate and, as far as possible, advising complainants to turn to other bodies1a<\/sup>;
\n__________
\n1a<\/sup> European Ombudsman, \u2018Annual Report 2022<\/a>\u2019, 25 April 2023.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n*** prevod ***<\/em>
\nSprememba 2<\/p>\n
\nv imenu skupine ECR<\/p>\n
\nUvodna izjava P a (nova)<\/p>\n
\nPa. ker je varuh \u010dlovekovih pravic leta 2022 \u0161e naprej prejemal veliko \u0161tevilo prito\u017eb v zvezi s pandemijo COVID-19, ki so se prete\u017eno nana\u0161ale na ukrepe, ki so jih nacionalni organi uvedli kot odziv na pandemijo, in na pravico do prostega gibanja v EU;
\nker je varuh \u010dlovekovih pravic odgovarjal tudi na prito\u017ebe, ki niso bile v njegovi pristojnosti, in vsem, ki so iskali pomo\u010d v jeziku prito\u017ebe ali v jeziku, ki jim je ljub\u0161i, tako da je pojasnil pristojnosti varuha \u010dlovekovih pravic in prito\u017enikom, kolikor je bilo mogo\u010de, svetoval, naj se obrnejo na druge organe1a<\/sup><\/p>\n
\n
\nAmendment 3<\/strong>
\n
\nCristian Terhe\u015f<\/strong>
\non behalf of the ECR Group<\/strong>
\n
\nMotion for a resolution<\/strong>
\nRecital P b (new)<\/strong>
\n
\nAmendment
\nPb. whereas in 2022 the Ombudsman determined that the manner in which the Commission addressed a request for public access to documents related to the quality of medical masks distributed during the COVID-19 pandemic1a<\/sup> constituted maladministration;
\nwhereas this judgment is grounded in the Commission\u2019s failure to grant complete access to three pending documents and the consequential issue that, due to the Commission\u2019s stalling for nearly two years, the complainant is currently unable to utilise the disclosed information for its originally intended purpose;
\n__________
\n<\/span><\/strong>1a<\/sup> European Ombudsman decision of 25 May 2022 on how the European Commission handled a request for public access to documents concerning the quality of medical masks distributed during the COVID-19 pandemic (case 790\/2021\/MIG)<\/span><\/strong><\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n*** prevod ***<\/em>
\nSprememba 3<\/p>\n
\nv imenu skupine ECR<\/p>\n
\nUvodna izjava P b (nova)<\/p>\n
\nPb. ker je varuh \u010dlovekovih pravic leta 2022 ugotovil, da je na\u010din, na katerega je Komisija obravnavala zahtevo za dostop javnosti do dokumentov, povezanih s kakovostjo medicinskih mask, razdeljenih med pandemijo COVID-191a<\/sup>, pomenil nepravilnosti pri upravljanju;
\nker ta sodba temelji na tem, da Komisija ni odobrila popolnega dostopa do treh dokumentov, ki so v obravnavi, in posledi\u010dno na tem, da prito\u017enik zaradi skoraj dveletnega zavla\u010devanja Komisije trenutno ne more uporabiti razkritih informacij za prvotno predvideni namen;<\/p>\n
\n
\nAmendment 4<\/strong>
\n
\nCristian Terhe\u015f<\/strong>
\non behalf of the ECR Group<\/strong>
\n
\nMotion for a resolution<\/strong>
\nRecital T a (new)<\/strong>
\n
\nAmendment
\nTa. whereas in 2022, noticing the flagrant absence of public information, the Ombudsman asked the Commission how it would ensure transparency in the negotiations of national recovery plans, how it would guarantee public scrutiny of milestones reached by Member States, and how it would supervise the audits1a<\/sup>;
\n__________
\n1a<\/sup> European Ombudsman, \u2018Ombudsman asks Commission how it will ensure accountability of recovery fund spending<\/a>\u2019, 28 February 2022.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n*** prevod ***<\/em>
\nSprememba 4<\/p>\n
\nv imenu skupine ECR<\/p>\n
\nUvodna izjava T a (nova)<\/p>\n
\nTa. ker je varuh \u010dlovekovih pravic leta 2022, ko je opazil o\u010ditno pomanjkanje javnih informacij, vpra\u0161al Komisijo, kako bo zagotovila preglednost pri pogajanjih o nacionalnih na\u010drtih za o\u017eivitev gospodarstva, kako bo zagotovila javni nadzor nad mejniki, ki so jih dosegle dr\u017eave \u010dlanice, in kako bo nadzorovala revizije1a<\/sup><\/p>\n
\n
\nAmendment 5<\/strong>
\n
\nCristian Terhe\u015f<\/strong>
\non behalf of the ECR Group<\/strong>
\n
\nMotion for a resolution<\/strong>
\nParagraph 2 a (new)<\/strong>
\n
\nAmendment
\n2a. Congratulates the European Ombudsman for her exemplary efforts during the pandemic years in safeguarding the rights of citizens against the unprecedented abuses by the Commission and in investigating the Commission\u2019s refusal to provide access to documents and text messages related to the negotiation of COVID-19 vaccine purchase contracts using public funds;<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n*** prevod ***<\/em>
\nSprememba 5<\/p>\n
\nv imenu skupine ECR<\/p>\n
\nOdstavek 2 a (novo)<\/p>\n
\n2a. \u010destita evropskemu varuhu \u010dlovekovih pravic za njena zgledna prizadevanja v letih pandemije pri varovanju pravic dr\u017eavljanov pred zlorabami Komisije brez primere in pri preiskavi zavrnitve dostopa Komisije do dokumentov in besedilnih sporo\u010dil, povezanih s pogajanji o pogodbah o nakupu cepiva COVID-19 z uporabo javnih sredstev;<\/p>\n
\n
\nAmendment 6<\/strong>
\n
\nCristian Terhe\u015f<\/strong>
\non behalf of the ECR Group<\/strong>
\n
\nMotion for a resolution<\/strong>
\nParagraph 14 a (new)<\/strong>
\n
\nAmendment
\n14a. Calls on the Ombudsman to persist in urging the Commission to immediately publish the unredacted contracts related to the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines;<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n*** prevod ***<\/em>
\nSprememba 6<\/p>\n
\nv imenu skupine ECR<\/p>\n
\nOdstavek 14 a (novo)<\/p>\n
\n14a. poziva varuha \u010dlovekovih pravic, naj Komisijo \u0161e naprej poziva, naj nemudoma objavi neredigirane pogodbe v zvezi z javnim naro\u010dilom cepiv COVID-19;<\/p>\n
\nza \/ proti \/ vzdr\u017eani – 543, 12, 64<\/p>\n
\n