Splavi in mrtvi dojenčki so bili opisani v tajni recenziji FDA, vendar skriti pred javnostjo 🇸🇮

Poslano 24.04.2023, 14:21:
mag Mateja Radej Bizjak Ministerstvo za zdravstvo
gp.zzs@zzs-mcs.si
larisa.vrtacnikjarc@zzs-mcs.si
mario.fafangel@nijz.si
CC:
Roman Jerala
Borut Štrukelj Prof.dr.farmacije
Vida Petrovčič RTV Slovenija
Ambrožič Manica RTV Slovenija
Tavčar-Pirkovič Ana RTV Slovenija
Sekumady CONDE RTV
MMC-uredniki@rtvslo.si
urednik@demokracija.si
urednica@radiorogla.si
urednik@celjan.si
urednik@mariborinfo.com
urednik@novice.si
urednik@planet-tv.si
urednistvo@n1info.com
Tanja Matko pravnica
sazu@sazu.si
Rosvita Pesek

Pfizer je poskušal skrivati ​​svoje poročilo 75 let

Igor Chudov

Aprila je bil ICAN izdan nov dokument, zahvaljujoč pravni tožbi FOIA, ki je vlado prisilila, da predloži dokumente Pfizerja, ki so jih poskušali obdržati v skrivnosti 75 let. Dejansko so imeli dober razlog, da so to skrivali.

Ta dokument se imenuje “PREGNANCY AND LACTATION CUMULATIVE REVIEW” (KUMULATIVNI PREGLED NOSEČNOSTI IN DOJENJA). Številne ugotovitve v njem potrjujejo številne pomisleke skeptikov glede cepiva COVID.

Podjetje Pfizer je ugotovilo 458 nosečnosti, pri katerih so bile matere cepljene (z neželenimi učinki in brez njih).

Od 673 poročil o primerih, opredeljenih v iskanju, jih je 458 vključevalo izpostavljenost BNT162b2 med nosečnostjo (mati/plod), 215 pa izpostavljenost med dojenjem.

V 210 od 458 primerov so poročali o izpostavljenosti matere … brez spremljajočih neželenih učinkov ali pa so imeli neželene učinke zaradi nenamenske uporabe (ali izdelka) za mater ali otroka.

Kaj se je zgodilo s tistimi nosečnostmi?

Cepivo prehaja skozi placento

Povedali so nam, da cepivo “ostane v roki”. Ali je to res?

Na strani 3 podjetje Pfizer opisuje dva primera (od 458) nerojenih otrok, prizadetih zaradi transplacentnega prenosa mRNA cepiva Covid. Pfizerjeve lastne besede:

Po Pfizerjevem priznanju je cepivo namesto v roki potovalo po materinem telesu, prodrlo v posteljico in negativno vplivalo na nerojeni plod.

Dva dojenčka iz zgornjega poročila sta umrla zaradi “hude dihalne stiske”. (AER 2021191405 in AER 2021155967)

Drugega dojenčka, rojenega v 24. tednu nosečnosti, niso spremljali, ker družbi Pfizer ni bilo dovolj mar, da bi odkrila, kaj se je zgodilo. Vendar je 24 tednov nosečnosti (5 mesecev od spočetja) zelo prezgoden porod. Približno polovica dojenčkov, rojenih v 24. tednu, umre, od preostalih pa jih 40 % konča z zdravstvenimi težavami. Molim, da je ta dojenček preživel in se dobro počuti, vendar tega ne moremo vedeti, družba Pfizer pa se je odločila, da ne bo razkrila, kaj se je zgodilo.

“Zdravstveni strokovnjaki”, ki so nosečnice vodili skozi pandemijo, so trdili, da cepivo ne prehaja skozi posteljico:

Visoka stopnja spontanih splavov

Od 458 nosečnosti se jih je 52 končalo z izgubo nosečnosti: splavom (izguba nosečnosti pod 20. tednom) ali spontanim splavom (izguba nosečnosti po 20. tednu). To je 11,3-odstotna stopnja izgube nosečnosti.

Pri tem niso upoštevani prezgodaj rojeni otroci, ki so umrli kmalu po rojstvu. Na primer zgoraj opisani nedonošenček AER 2021191405 je umrl v hudi dihalni stiski po nujnem carskem rezu, ki je sledil materinemu cepljenju s cepivom COVID.

Ali je 11,3 % izgubljenih nosečnosti normalno ali nenormalno veliko? Arkmedic je pojasnil, da je na to vprašanje težko odgovoriti, saj je verjetnost izgube nosečnosti odvisna od tedna nosečnosti in je največja v prvih tednih. Ko nosečnice preidejo te prve tedne, se možnost izgube nosečnosti močno zmanjša.

Na primer, ženske, ki se cepijo v 23. tednu, kot je bila mama AER 2021191405, že niso imele zgodnjega splava in njihove možnosti za izgubo nosečnosti bi bile v tem trenutku majhne.

Ker so bile v Pfizerjevi populaciji 458 nosečnic cepljene ženske vseh gestacijskih starosti, bi morala biti pričakovana stopnja izgube nosečnosti (od trenutka cepljenja) veliko nižja, kot če bi izgube šteli od trenutka spočetja.

Če se vprašamo: “Kolikšna bi bila običajna stopnja izgube nosečnosti pri teh 458 ženskah, če bi jim namesto cepiva Covid vbrizgali placebo,” bi bila natančna ocena skoraj nemogoča. Vendar je manj kot 11,3 %. Če želite izvedeti podrobnosti, si preberite Arkmedicov članek.

Vemo tudi, da cepivo Moderna (večji odmerek) poveča možnost izgube nosečnosti za 42 % v primerjavi s cepivom Pfizer, kar kaže na povezavo med odmerkom in odzivom.

Spodnja slika, ki je iz preteklosti izpred dveh let, je dokazala, da so bili pomisleki demonstranta daljnovidni:

Pfizerjevo poročilo izpušča mrtvega dojenčka

Pfizerjevo poročilo, ki na strani 6 navaja neželene učinke pri dojenih dojenčkih, ne omenja nobenega mrtvega dojenčka, ki je umrl med dojenjem. Vendar prejšnje Prizerjevo postmarketinško poročilo omenja enega dojenega dojenčka, ki je umrl kmalu po cepljenju svoje matere. Pred enim letom sem pisal o tem dojenčku.

Ne vem, zakaj je družba Pfizer “izginila” mrtvega dojenčka. Morda so pozabili? Lahko le ugibamo.

Na nek način so matere, ki so prejele Pfizerjevo cepivo, srečnice. Pri ženskah, ki so prejele cepivo Moderna, je bilo za 42 % večja verjetnost spontanega splava in 93 % večja verjetnost, da bo njihov dojenček umrl po rojstvu.

Kaj menite vi?

*** Prevod narejen z www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) ***

 

===== Originalni prispevek https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/miscarriages-and-dead-infants-were =====

Miscarriages and Dead Infants Were Described in a Secret FDA Review, but Hidden from The Public

Pfizer Tried to Hide Its Report for 75 Years

Igor Chudov

A new document was released to ICAN this April, thanks to a FOIA legal action that compelled the government to provide Pfizer documents they tried to keep secret for 75 years. Indeed, they had a good reason to hide it.

That document is called “PREGNANCY AND LACTATION CUMULATIVE REVIEW.” Many findings in it validate several concerns of COVID vaccine skeptics.

Pfizer identified 458 pregnancies where mothers were vaccinated (with and without adverse events).

Of the 673 case reports identified in the search, 458 involved BNT162b2 exposure during pregnancy (mother/fetus) and 215 involved exposure during breast-feeding.

In 210 out of the 458 cases, maternal exposure … was reported either with no associated AEs or with AE off-label use/product use issue for either the mother or the baby.

What happened to those pregnancies?

The Vaccine Does Cross the Placenta

We were told that the vaccine “stays in the arm.” Was that true?

On Page 3, Pfizer describes two cases (out of 458) of unborn babies affected by transplacental transfer of mRNA Covid vaccine. Pfizer’s own words:

So, instead of staying in the arm, by Pfizer’s admission, the vaccine traveled through the mother’s body, penetrated the placenta, and adversely impacted the unborn fetuses.

Two infants in the above report died of “severe respiratory distress.” (AER 2021191405 and AER 2021155967)

Another infant, born at 24 weeks of gestation, was not followed up because Pfizer did not care enough to discover what happened. However, 24 weeks gestation (5 months since conception) is a very premature birth. About half of the infants born at 24 weeks die, and of the remaining ones, 40% end up with health issues. I pray that that specific infant survived and is doing well; however, we cannot know, and Pfizer chose not to disclose what happened.

The “health experts” who guided pregnant women through the pandemic claimed that the vaccine does not cross the placenta:

High Rate of Miscarriages

Of the 458 pregnancies, 52 ended with pregnancy losses: miscarriage (pregnancy loss under 20 weeks) or spontaneous abortion (pregnancy loss past 20 weeks). That is an 11.3% rate of pregnancy loss.

This did not count the premature infants who died shortly after birth. For example, the above-described premature baby AER 2021191405, died in severe respiratory distress after an emergency C-section following the mother’s COVID vaccination.

Is 11.3% of pregnancies lost normal, or is it abnormally high? Arkmedic explained that answering this question is difficult because the chances of pregnancy loss depend on the week of gestation and are highest in the early weeks. Once pregnant women pass those early weeks, the chance of a loss drops dramatically.

For example, the women who get vaccinated at 23 weeks, like the mom of AER 2021191405, already did not have an early miscarriage, and their chances of pregnancy loss would be low by that moment.

As women of all gestational ages were vaccinated in Pfizer’s population of 458 pregnancies, the expected rate of pregnancy losses (from the moment of vaccination) should be much lower than if the losses were counted from the moment of conception.

If we ask, “What would be a normal pregnancy loss rate of those 458 women if they were injected with a placebo instead of the Covid vaccine,” the precise estimate would be near impossible. However, it is less than 11.3%. Read Arkmedic’s article if you want to know the details.

We also know that the Moderna vaccine (higher dose) increases the chances of pregnancy loss by 42% compared to Pfizer, suggesting a dose-response relationship.

The picture below, a blast from the past from two years ago, proved that the concerns of the person demonstrating were prescient:
“Need an abortion? Try the COVID vaccine”

Pfizer Report Omits Dead Infant

The Pfizer report, listing adverse events to breastfed infants on page 6, does not mention any dead infants who died while breastfeeding. However, the previous Prizer postmarketing report does mention one breastfeeding infant who died soon after his or her mother was vaccinated. I wrote about that infant a year ago.

Not sure why Pfizer “disappeared” the dead infant. Maybe they forgot? We can only guess.

In a way, the mothers who received the Pfizer vaccine are the lucky ones. The women who received Moderna were 42% more likely to suffer a miscarriage and 93% more likely to have their infant die after birth.

What do you think?